This text uses utf-8 (unicode) file encoding. If the apostrophes andquotation marks in this paragraph appear as garbage, you may have anincompatible browser or unavailable fonts. First, make sure that thebrowser’s “character set” or “file encoding” is set to Unicode (UTF-8).You may also need to change your browser’s default font.
Page numbers in brackets or parentheses may have been added by theeditor. Footnotes to “One Epistle” are shown in the side margin; notesto “The Blatant-Beast” have been renumbered and grouped at the end ofthe poem. Other notes are labeled and formatted as in the original. Allbrackets are in the original.
Earl R. Miner, University of California, Los Angeles
Maximillian E. Novak, University of California,Los Angeles
Lawrence Clark Powell, Wm. Andrews Clark Memorial Library
Richard C. Boys, University of Michigan
John Butt, University of Edinburgh
James L. Clifford, Columbia University
Ralph Cohen, University of California, Los Angeles
Vinton A. Dearing, University of California,Los Angeles
Arthur Friedman, University of Chicago
Louis A. Landa, Princeton University
Samuel H. Monk, University of Minnesota
Everett T. Moore, University of California,Los Angeles
James Sutherland, University College, London
H. T. Swedenberg, Jr., University of California,Los Angeles
Edna C. Davis, Clark Memorial Library
One Epistle To Mr. Pope, complained Pope to Bethel, “containsas many Lyes as Lines.” But just for that reason it is not, as Pope alsosays in the same letter, “below all notice.”1 The Blatant Beast,published twelve years later, is another attack on Pope almost ascompendious and quite as virulent. They are here presented to the modernstudent of Pope as good examples of their kind. The importance of thepamphlet attacks on Pope for a full understanding