This text includes characters thatrequire UTF-8 (Unicode) file encoding, including a few lines ofGreek:
⁂ [asterism]
œ [“oe” ligature]
Ἕκτορος ἀντικρὺ, βαλέειν δὲ ἑ ἵετο θυμός·
If any of these characters do not display properly, or if theapostrophes and quotation marks in this paragraph appear as garbage, youmay have an incompatible browser or unavailable fonts. First, make surethat the browser’s “character set” or “file encoding” is set to Unicode(UTF-8). You may also need to change your browser’s default font.
In addition to the ordinary page numbers, the printed text labeledthe recto (odd) pages of the first four leaves of each 8-page signature.These will appear in the margin as A, A2...
For this e-text, footnote markers in the Cursory Observationshave been changed from simple asterisks * to capital letters A*,and shorter footnotes are displayed as inset sidenotes. Other notes andmarkers are unchanged. All brackets are in the original.
Errors are shown with mouse-hover popups.In the Cursory Observations, thetext was left as printed except when the error was unambiguous. Inquoted verses, the use of y for þ (th) and z for ȝ (gh) isunchanged.
Introduction
Cursory Observations
Publisher’s Advertising
Augustan Reprints
George Robert Guffey, University of California, LosAngeles
Earl R. Miner, University of California, Los Angeles
Maximillian E. Novak, University of California,Los Angeles
Robert Vosper, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library
Richard C. Boys, University of Michigan
James L. Clifford, Columbia University
Ralph Cohen, University of California, Los Angeles
Vinton A. Dearing, University of California,Los Angeles
Arthur Friedman, University of Chicago
Louis A. Landa, Princeton University
Samuel H. Monk, University of Minnesota
Everett T. Moore, University of California,Los Angeles
Lawrence Clark Powell, William Andrews Clark MemorialLibrary
James Sutherland, University College, London
H. T. Swedenberg, Jr., University of California,Los Angeles
Edna C. Davis, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library
Edmond Malone’s Cursory Observations was the most timelypublication in the Rowley controversy. His work appeared just as thedebate over the authenticity of the poems attributed to afifteenth-century priest was, after twelve years, entering its mostcrucial phase.