Transcriber's Notes:
Greek words that may not display correctly in all browsers aretransliterated in the text using hovers like this:βιβλος.Position your mouse over the line to see the transliteration.
Hemistitchs, metrical lines shared between speakers or verses, may notdisplay properly in all browsers. The best way to see appropriatelyspaced hemistitches is by looking at a text version of this book.
Variations in spelling and hyphenation have been left as in theoriginal. A few typographical errors have been corrected. They have been markedwith hovers like this. Position your mouse over the underline to readwhat appears in the original. A complete list of corrections as well asother Transcriber's Notes follows the text.
Click on the page number to see an image of the page.
[i]
[ii]
[iii]
BY THE LATE
BY
PUBLISHT FOR
The New Shakspere Society
LONDON, E.C., 1876.
[iv]Series VIII. No. 1
JOHN CHILDS AND SON, PRINTERS.
[v]
This Letter by Prof. Spalding has always seemd to me one of the ablest(if not the ablest) and most stimulating pieces of Shakspere criticism Iever read. And even if you differ from the writer's conclusion as toShakspere's part, or even hold that Shakspere took no part at all, inthe Play, you still get almost as much good from the essay as if youaccept its conclusions as to the authorship of The Two Noble Kinsmen.It is for its general, more than for its special, discussions, that Ivalue this Letter. The close reasoning, the spirited language, theperception and distinction of the special qualities of Shakspere's work,the investigation into the nature of