Transcribed from the 1818 edition , email
SECOND EDITION.
“Is not the separate Property of a Thing thegreat Cause of its endearment? Does any one respect aCommon as much as he does his Garden?”
South.
BY AN OLDINHABITANT.
LONDON:
PUBLISHEDAND SOLD BY J. M. RICHARDSON, 23, CORNHILL,
OPPOSITE THE ROYAL EXCHANGE;
And can be had of the Newsmen in the several Parishes of Barking,Chigwell,
Chinkford, Dagenham, Epping, East Ham, Great Ilford, LittleIlford,
Leyton, Loughton, Lambourne, Nazing, Theydon-Bois,Stapleford-Abbot,
Stratford, West Ham, Wanstead, Walthamstow, Waltham HolyCross,
Woodford; and of Messrs. Chalk and Meggy, Chelmsford.
1818.
[Price One Shilling.]
GENTLEMEN,
WHEN I took the liberty of addressing you, inJanuary last, on the subject of the projected inclosure ofthese Forests, I could not foresee that the plan Isubmitted to general consideration would have been adopted by theCommissioners of Woods and Forests, which it appears,by the Heads of the Bill, they now propose bringinginto Parliament has been done; p. 4and the giving effect to aplan, on the mere suggestion of a private individual,whose name was not even known to them, shews, ontheir part, the strongest desire, in executing theduties of their office, to afford every possible degree ofaccommodation to the interest and convenience of the persons tobe affected by it. Connected as I am with gentlemenwho have considerable property in these Forests, I doearnestly hope that the plan I have suggested, and whichhas been, on the part of the Commissioners of Woods andForests, so liberally adopted, will be carried intoeffect; and, at the request of several friends,I have been induced to re-publish my Thoughts on thesubject, in the hope that they may have some weight,with my readers, in convincing them of the expediencyof giving their earnest support to the Bill now proposed.
I remain, Gentlemen,
With great respect.
Your very obedientservant,
THOMAS STREET,
Philpot-Lane, London,
15th April,1818.
The local knowledge acquired byo